BioClinica Trial Blazers headerC

Subscribe by Email

Your email:

Connect with BioClinica

Current Articles | RSS Feed RSS Feed

The Use of Biomarkers and PET in Early Alzheimer’s Disease Diagnosis

 

The Use of Imaging Biomarkers and Positron Emission Tomography to Diagnose Early Alzheimer’s Disease

Colin G. Miller Colin G. Miller, PhD FICR CSci
Alzheimer’s disease (AD) is the most common form of dementia and is incurable, degenerative and irreversible.  It affects around 4.5 million people in the United States, a number that is expected to exceed 12 million by 2050.  Neuropsychological tests, such as the mini-mental state examination (MMSE), are commonly used to diagnose patients. However, cognitive impairment may be due to another disease, not Alzheimer’s.  There remains an unmet need to be able to differentiate between different forms of dementia.

Imaging biomarkers are providing new diagnostic tools. One of the seminal biomarkers for Alzheimer’s disease is Pittsburgh compound B (PiB).  PiB is a fluorescent analog of thioflavin T; it is used in combination with Positron Emission Tomography (PET) scans to image beta-amyloid plaques in the brains of Alzheimer’s disease patients (more information here). Beta-amyloid has been proven to be a hallmark of Alzheimer’s disease and is accumulated in the brain in the very early course of the disease (more information here).

Recent PiB PET studies Recent PiB PET studies have shown that they can improve the accuracy of dementia diagnosis in early stages of the disease by measuring disease-related amyloid accumulation.

PET Neurochemical ClassificationSource:  Society of Nuclear Medicine, 2009 Press Conference on Scientific Paper 251, “PET Neurochemical vs. Clinical Phenotypes in Mild-Early Dementia.” (see PowerPoint document for reference)

Companies are now developing imaging biomarkers for Alzheimer’s disease diagnosis.  Bayer has florbetaben (BAY 94-9172), an 18F radiolabeled tracer that binds to beta-amyloid in phase III clinical trials.  Avid Radiopharmaceuticals is a company purely focused on new imaging biomarkers with AV-45 in Phase III development.

Presuming that florbetaben or AV-45 ends up being approved, it will be interesting to see what price the respective companies charges for these injectable tracers.  Not only do imaging biomarkers have to work, they have to be cost-effective in today’s healthcare environment.

What are your thoughts on using biomarkers and PET in early diagnosis of Alzheimer’s disease?

Sources:

  1. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/14991808
  2. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16854944
  3. http://www.snm.org/index.cfm?PageID=8779&RPID=8729
  4. http://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT01020838

Comments

Hi Colin, 
 
Great to see this question for discussion. 
 
Please correct the text accordingly: 
 
"Three companies GE, Bayer and AVID are developing imaging biomarkers for amyloid detection in the brain. (not for Alzheimer’s disease diagnosis). GE has Flutemetamol, an 18F radiolabeled version of well known PiB scan that also manufactured and supplied by GE(11C-PiB presented on slides was studies in over 6000 patients world-wide in over 60 imaging sites), Bayer has florbetaben (BAY 94-9172), an 18F radiolabeled tracer. Avid Radiopharmaceuticals is a company purely focused on new imaging biomarkers with AV-45. All these 18F compounds are in Phase III Development. 
 
Presuming that some of these three compounds ends up being approved, it will be interesting to see what price the respective companies charges for these injectable tracers" 
 
And I think the pricing will be very reasonable and comparable to FDG-PET. But pricing is not only the issue. The most important is the quality of manufacturing to follow GMP standards.
Posted @ Wednesday, July 28, 2010 9:40 PM by Igor Grachev
Hi Igor, 
 
 
 
Many thanks for your suggeswted corrections. I greatly appreciate the input - I was not intending to be exclusive in any of my statements. 
 
 
 
I agree with your staement on the need to follow GMP standards. It is my understanding that there are in fact 2 sets of standards, the EU and FDA. Since you are one of the experts in this area, do you have an opinion on the optimal methodology? Also how many centers do you know in the USA that are curently following GMP standards?
Posted @ Thursday, July 29, 2010 8:19 PM by Colin Miller
Post Comment
Name
 *
Email
 *
Website (optional)
Comment
 *

Allowed tags: <a> link, <b> bold, <i> italics