BioClinica Trial Blazers headerC

Subscribe by Email

Your email:

Connect with BioClinica

Current Articles | RSS Feed RSS Feed

How Will the Stimulus Package Affect Clinical Research?

 

How Will the Stimulus Package Affect Clinical Research?

Jennifer Price Jennifer Price, CDISC CDASH Registered Service Provider (RSP)
To borrow from Oprah, here is what I know for sure:

  • Each physician could receive over $48,000 from Medicare, or $65,000 from Medicaid, by implementing or already using Electronic Health Records (EHR) (See article).
  • To qualify, the EHR system users must be a ‘meaningful user'. This means users should be trained on how to use the system and must use it in a meaningful way such as by using electronic prescribing, exchanging data with other systems and reporting on quality and safety measures. (Full HHS overview of meaningful use here).
  • Government will take a leadership role in developing standards that allow for the electronic exchange and use of healthcare information.

I've been trying to figure out how this will affect the future of clinical research. Here are my thoughts so far, and yes, I do think in bullet points!

Implication on Clinical Research:

  • Study sites will be using EHR. But all the sites in a clinical trial will not be using the same EHR. What will this be like for the monitor who has to visit 10 different sites that use six different EHR systems? Will the monitors even be allowed to login? What will source verification look like?
  • The data in an EHR isn't exactly the same as what is needed for clinical trials. For example, in the EHR would be listed all surgeries for a patient, where the clinical trial protocol may only call for surgery relevant to a certain indication. All of a patient's medication would be listed, but perhaps only the medication taken within the past 30 days may be collected for the clinical trial.
  • Clinical trial data isn't always represented in the EHR. An example of this is drug accountability showing compliance with a study drug. So, what is the source for this data?
  • CDISC and the Integrating the Healthcare Enterprise (IHE) have developed technology that is used to push forms into an EHR called Retrieve Form for Data-Capture (RFD) (See full CDISC article). This technology can be used to collect clinical research data within an EHR and pass it out to an external system such as EDC. BioClinica has exhibited this technology, so it does work and it is real. How is this going to play out? Is this the solution to pulling data from EHR to EDC?
  • Physicians are saying that the HITECH Act is turning them into an IT shop. (Referenced by article on Boston.com). They must buy hardware and software, provide training, figure out disaster recovery plans, and deal with installs and updates. Is this how we want our physicians using their time?

I welcome comments, opinions and thoughts on any of the items above.


Comments

As an EHR user, I clearly understand the kind of issues that may crop into the clinical research process. 
But I think there is clearly a way out of most of the issues posted by you. It ultimately depends on the EHR vendor and kind of specialty specific EHR solution he provides. 
 
Also today one could modify or customize the templates based on the requirements of the clinical practice.  
By the the introduction of REC’s through the HITECH act. is a great way to avail of quality EHR solutions at competitive prices. The stiff competition among not only these REC’s but also among EHR vendors ( to become a preferred vendor of a given REC) will result in lot of positives to medical practioners. 
 
The current jungle of EHR vendors without quality products is going to make the life of practices very difficult. Though you provide them with many comparisons grids, in most cases they may end up with an EHR which does not support the needs of its speciality. I believe an speciality based EHR combined with appropriate certifications is the way ahead.  
 
I think the federal efforts of providing the right incentives to practices who implement certified EHR's following the appropriate <a href="http://www.waitingroomsolutions.com/wrs/arra-stimulus-money-44k-arra-emr-stimulus-bill-arra-ehr-stimulus-incentives#meaningful_use_EHR>federal guidelines is a great initiative. 
Posted @ Thursday, July 29, 2010 6:11 PM by Vishal
As an EHR user, I clearly understand the kind of issues that may crop into the clinical research process. 
But I think there is clearly a way out of most of the issues posted by you. It ultimately depends on the EHR vendor and kind of specialty specific EHR solution he provides. 
 
Also today one could modify or customize the templates based on the requirements of the clinical practice.  
By the the introduction of REC’s through the HITECH act. is a great way to avail of quality EHR solutions at competitive prices. The stiff competition among not only these REC’s but also among EHR vendors ( to become a preferred vendor of a given REC) will result in lot of positives to medical practioners. 
 
The current jungle of EHR vendors without quality products is going to make the life of practices very difficult. Though you provide them with many comparisons grids, in most cases they may end up with an EHR which does not support the needs of its speciality. I believe an speciality based EHR combined with appropriate certifications is the way ahead.  
 
I think the federal efforts of providing the right incentives to practices who implement certified EHR's following the appropriate <a href="http://www.waitingroomsolutions.com/wrs/arra-stimulus-money-44k-arra-emr-stimulus-bill-arra-ehr-stimulus-incentives#meaningful_use_EHR>federal guidelines is a great initiative. 
Posted @ Thursday, July 29, 2010 6:19 PM by Vishal
As an EHR user, I clearly understand the kind of issues that may crop into the clinical research process. 
But I think there is clearly a way out of most of the issues posted by you. It ultimately depends on the EHR vendor and kind of specialty specific EHR solution he provides. 
 
Also today one could modify or customize the templates based on the requirements of the clinical practice.  
By the the introduction of REC’s through the HITECH act. is a great way to avail of quality EHR solutions at competitive prices. The stiff competition among not only these REC’s but also among EHR vendors ( to become a preferred vendor of a given REC) will result in lot of positives to medical practioners. 
 
The current jungle of EHR vendors without quality products is going to make the life of practices very difficult. Though you provide them with many comparisons grids, in most cases they may end up with an EHR which does not support the needs of its speciality. I believe an speciality based EHR combined with appropriate certifications is the way ahead.  
 
I think the federal efforts of providing the right incentives to practices who implement certified EHR's following the appropriate <a href="http://www.waitingroomsolutions.com/wrs/arra-stimulus-money-44k-arra-emr-stimulus-bill-arra-ehr-stimulus-incentives#meaningful_use_EHR>federal guidelines is a great initiative. 
Posted @ Thursday, July 29, 2010 10:40 PM by Vishal
Post Comment
Name
 *
Email
 *
Website (optional)
Comment
 *

Allowed tags: <a> link, <b> bold, <i> italics